Off-Prem

PaaS + IaaS

Amazon to cough $75B on capex in 2024, more next year

Despite extending server lifespans, AI's power demands drive more datacenter builds


Amazon expects to spend $75 billion on capital expenditure in 2024 and even more in 2025 – mostly on its cloud computing business – due to rising demand for generative AI and as more customers ditch their on-premises workloads.

The web services arm of Amazon (AWS) reported calendar Q3 net sales of $27.45 billion, up 19 percent year-on-year, and operating expenses of $17 billion, up from $16.08 billion. Operating profit jumped almost 50 percent to $10.45 billion.

In a contradiction to the message delivered to the UK's Competition and Markets Authority in its probe into the health of the local cloud market, AWS told investors last night that its business just keeps on expanding.

"We see more enterprises growing their footprint in the cloud, evidenced in part by recent customer deals with the ANZ Banking Group, Booking.com, Capital One, Fast Retailing, Itau Unibanco, National Australia Bank, Sony, T-Mobile, and Toyota," said Amazon CEO Andy Jassy, who previously ran AWS when Jeff Bezos headed Amazon.

"Companies are focused on new efforts again, spending energy on modernizing their infrastructure from on-premises to the cloud," he added. This helps customer orgs "save money, innovate more quickly, and get more productivity from their scarce engineering resources."

Just weeks back, AWS told the CMA that customers deciding to repatriate workloads from the cloud was providing stiff competition," and talked of the "attractiveness of moving back to on-premises." It said this to prove that customers don't face any difficulties in switching from its platform, one of the major tenets of the regulator's investigation.

Strange how tech businesses – not just AWS – bend their messaging to suit their audience. What really seems to be fueling continued expansion, according to Jassy, is customers plotting their steps to use generative AI, including training models.

"Our AI business is a multibillion-dollar business that's growing triple-digit percentages year over year and is growing three times faster at its stage of evolution than AWS did itself. We thought AWS grew pretty fast," said the CEO.

"The thing to remember about the AWS business is that the cash life cycle is such that the faster we grow demand, the faster we have to invest capital in datacenters and networking gear and hardware. And of course, in the hardware of AI, the accelerators or the chips are more expensive than the CPU hardware.

"We invest in all of that upfront in advance of when we can monetize it with customers using the resources. But, of course, a lot of these assets are many-year useful life assets. Datacenters, for instance, are useful assets for 20 to 30 years. And so I think we've proven over time that we can drive enough operating income and free cash flow to make this very successful return on invested capital business."

Speaking of which, Jassy forecast an eye-watering amount of capex for AWS this year. "We expect to spend about $75 billion in 2024. I suspect we'll spend more on that in 2025. And the majority of it is for AWS and, specifically, the increased bumps here are really driven by generative AI."

Last year, capex was at a relatively paltry $48.4 billion. The company, like Microsoft and Google, extended the life of its servers. Amazon has 353 datacenters in 38 markets and another 45 sites being built, according to Baxtel.

As noted earlier this week, Steve Brazier, fellow at analyst Informa, estimated that hyperscalers have sunk $200 billion into capex since the start of last year, and all are feeling the squeeze from investors who want to see a return.

"With around $200 billion in capex, only about $20 billion of revenue is actually coming from consumers and businesses in terms of AI services, things like Copilot licenses and ChatGPT licenses, so a very poor return in true results in terms of end users. And the whole bet [whether] the AI explosion continues or not will depend on whether they can get that $20 billion up as quickly as they hope."

The race is on. ®

Send us news
1 Comment

AI firms and civil society groups plead for passage of federal AI law ASAP

Congress urged to act before year's end to support US competitiveness

Microsoft accused of 'greenwashing' as AI used in fossil fuel exploration

Activists press Redmond to come clean on ‘material reputational, legal, and operational risks’

Cloud repatriation officially a trend... for specific workloads

It's not a mass exodus, say analysts, but biz bods are bringing things down to earth

Developer pockets $2M in savings from going cloud-free

37signals CTO claims cost of new hardware was 'entirely recouped' as contracts expired after AWS exit

Gary Marcus proposes generative AI boycott to push for regulation, tame Silicon Valley

'I am deeply concerned about how creative work is essentially being stolen at scale'

AWS Cloud Development Kit flaw exposed accounts to full takeover

Remember Bucket Monopoly? Yeah, it gets worse

Sorry, but the ROI on enterprise AI is abysmal

Appen points to, among other problems, a lack of high-quality training data labeled by humans

OpenAI loses another senior figure, disperses safety research team he led

Artificial General Intelligence readiness advisor Miles Brundage bails, because nobody is ready

Polish radio station ditches DJs, journalists for AI-generated college kids

Station claims it's visionary, ex-employees claim it's cynical; reality appears way more fiscal

Amazon adds MFA to its enterprise email service ... eight years after launch

No rush, guys

UK’s new Minister for Science and Technology comes to US touting Britain's AI benefits

$82B in investment shows we've still got it as a nation

Linus Torvalds: 90% of AI marketing is hype

Linux kernel creator says let's see which workloads use GenAI in five years