Off-Prem

Netherlands fines Uber €290M for improper EU-US driver data transfers

The ride-sharing provider insists it broke no rules during the three-year legal gap


Privacy authorities in the Netherlands have imposed a €290 million ($324 million) fine on ride-share giant Uber for sending driver data to servers in the United States - "a serious violation" of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

According to the Dutch Data Protection Authority (DPA), Uber spent years sending sensitive driver information from Europe to the US. Among the data that was transmitted were taxi licenses, location data, payment details, identity documents, and medical and criminal records. The data was sent abroad without the use of "transfer tools," which the DPA said means the data wasn't sufficiently protected. 

"Businesses are usually obliged to take additional measures if they store personal data of Europeans outside the European Union," Dutch DPA chairman Aleid Wolfsen said of the decision. "Uber did not meet the requirements of the GDPR to ensure the level of protection to the data with regard to transfers to the US. That is very serious."

The Dutch DPA said that the investigation that led to the fine began after complaints from a group of more than 170 French Uber drivers who alleged their data was being sent to the US without adequate protection. Because Uber's European operations are based in the Netherlands, enforcement for GDPR violations fell to the Dutch DPA. 

Unfortunately for Uber, it already has an extensive history with the Dutch DPA, which has fined the outfit twice before. 

The first came in 2018 when the authority fined Uber €600,000 for failing to report a data breach (a slugfest that several EU countries joined in on). The latter €10 million fine came earlier this year after Dutch officials determined Uber had failed to disclose data retention practices surrounding the data of EU drivers, refusing to name which countries data was sent to, and had obstructed its drivers' right to privacy. 

Uber asks officials to remember their history

This latest fine appears to be a step too far for Uber, which told The Register it intends to appeal the Dutch DPA's decision because it said it had no clear instructions on how to do otherwise. 

"This flawed decision and extraordinary fine are completely unjustified," an Uber spokesperson told us in an emailed statement. "Uber's cross-border data transfer process was compliant with GDPR during a three-year period of immense uncertainty between the EU and US." 

The uncertainty Uber refers to stems from the EU's striking down of the EU-US Privacy Shield agreement and the years of efforts to replace it with a new rule that defines the safe transfer of personal data between the two regions. 

Uber claims it's done its job under the GDPR to safeguard data belonging to European citizens - it didn't even need to make any data transfer process changes to comply the latest rules. 

The striking down of Privacy Shield, according to the Computer and Communications Industry Association of Europe, left companies doing business in the EU and US with "virtually no legal bases to move data to the US" between 2020 and the final passage of the Data Privacy Framework in 2023. 

That framework has helped smooth the road going forward, but "it does not account for the three-year legal gap left behind," the CCIA said. 

"The busiest internet route in the world could not simply be put on hold for three entire years while governments worked to establish a new legal framework for these data flows," said CCIA Europe head of policy Alexandre Roure. 

We're told Uber has one week left to file its objection, and that the fine must be paid after appeals have been exhausted - a process the outfit claims could buy it as many as four years of stalling to avoid having to pay out. ®

Send us news
17 Comments

Yet another UK government seeks to reform GDPR

Yes, the law that needs to be harmonized with Europe for tech businesses' data to flow freely

'Consent' LinkedIn used for data processing was not freely given, says Ireland

Microsoft-owned social media for suits site gets €310M fine, told to get compliant

NHS would be hit by 'significant' costs if UK loses EU data status, warn Lords

As another government yet again seeks to reform UK GDPR, legislators say data must continue to flow

US lawmakers push DoJ to prosecute tax prep firms for leaking taxpayer data to big tech

TaxSlayer, H&R Block, TaxAct, and Ramsey Solutions accused of sharing info with Meta and Google

Worker surveillance must comply with credit reporting rules

US Consumer Financial Protection Bureau demands transparency, accountability from sellers of employee metrics

Top EU court overturns Intel's billion-dollar antitrust fine

Conditional rebates settled, but $400M matter of naked restrictions remains

Here's a NIS2 compliance checklist since no one cares about deadlines anymore

Only two EU members have completed the transposition into domestic law

US moves ahead with crackdown on data brokers selling to six 'countries of concern'

Biden's Executive Order finally getting its day in the sun, soonish

Jetpack fixes 8-year-old flaw affecting millions of WordPress sites

Also, new EU cyber reporting rules are live, exploiters hit the gas pedal, free PDNS for UK schools, and more

NHS England warned about plans to extend Covid-era rules for patient data access

Governance and public consultation need work before rule change goes ahead

Smart TVs are spying on everyone

Regulators know this is a nightmare and have done little to stop it. Privacy advocacy group wants that to change

UK ponders USB-C as common charging standard

Will it also plug into some common sense?